Het IMF wil het het globale financiële systeem van zijn ondergang redden.
En jawel, U had het reeds kunnen raden, ook U kan hen helpen door een steentje bij te dragen, allen samen halen we het wel.
Het IMF heeft U nu nodig!
![]()
Old fashioned taxation is out. Expect outright grand larceny at the local bank enforced by the government.
WSJ - Romain Hatchuel: The Coming Global Wealth Tax
3 december 2013
Lees ook :
Sovereign man - The IMF wants you to pay 71% income tax
12 december 2013
Hoe zou U het IMF en onze wereld het liefst verderhelpen? Een eenmalige heffing, een belasting op de spaartegoeden als een uitzonderlijke maatregel aka het Cyprus-stijl haarsnitje of zag U liever het nieuwste plan van de genieën van het IMF geimplementeerd, nl. de inkomsten van alle landen trachten te maximaliseren mbv. een verhoging van de inkomstenbelasting tot pakweg 71% (dit nieuwe plan noemt men bij het IMF: revenue-maximizing top income tax rates)?
Aan U de keuze, maar er moet nu ingegrepen worden zodat het kaartenhuisje, het globale financiële systeem niet instort.
Koop U vrij voor het te laat is!
En jawel, U had het reeds kunnen raden, ook U kan hen helpen door een steentje bij te dragen, allen samen halen we het wel.
Het IMF heeft U nu nodig!
Old fashioned taxation is out. Expect outright grand larceny at the local bank enforced by the government.
WSJ - Romain Hatchuel: The Coming Global Wealth Tax
3 december 2013
What the IMF calls "revenue-maximizing top income tax rates" may be a good indication of how much further those rates could rise: As the IMF calculates, the average revenue-maximizing rate for the main Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development countries is around 60%, way above existing levels.
For the U.S., it is 56% to 71%far more than the current 45% paid in federal, state and local taxes by those in the top tax bracket. The IMF singles out the U.S. as the country where raising top rates toward 70% (where they were before the Reagan tax cuts) would yield the most revenuearound 1.25% of GDP. And with a chilling candor, the IMF admits that its revenue-maximizing approach takes no account of the well-being of top earners (or their businesses).
Taxes can rise in ways both prominent and subtle.
...
As applied to the euro zone, the IMF claims that a 10% levy on households' positive net worth would bring public debt levels back to pre-financial crisis levels. Such a tax sounds crazy, but recall what happened in euro-zone country Cyprus this year: Holders of bank accounts larger than 100,000 euros had to incur losses of up to 100% on their savings above that threshold, in order to "bail-in" the bankrupt Mediterranean state. Japanese households, sitting on one of the world's largest pools of savings, have particular reason to worry about their assets: At 240% of GDP, their country's public debt ratio is more than twice that of Cyprus when it defaulted.
From New York to London, Paris and beyond, powerful economic players are deciding that with an ever-deteriorating global fiscal outlook, conventional levels and methods of taxation will no longer suffice. That makes weapons of mass wealth destructionsuch as the IMF's one-off capital levy, Cyprus's bank deposit confiscation, or outright sovereign defaultslikelier by the day.
Lees ook :
Sovereign man - The IMF wants you to pay 71% income tax
12 december 2013
The IMF just dropped another bombshell.
After it recently suggested a one-off capital levy a one-time tax on private wealth as an exceptional measure to restore debt sustainability across insolvent countries it has now called for revenue-maximizing top income tax rates.
The IMFs team of monkeys has been working around the clock on this one, figuring that developed nations can increase their overall tax revenue by increasing tax rates.
Theyve singled out the US, suggesting that the US government could maximize its tax revenue by increasing tax brackets to as high as 71%.
Coming from one of the grand wizards of the global financial system, this might be the clearest sign yet that the whole house of cards is dangerously close to being swept away.
Think about it solvent governments with healthy economies dont go looking to steal 71% of peoples wealth. Theyre raising this point because these governments are desperate. And flat broke.
The ratio of public debt to GDP across advanced economies will reach a historic peak of 110% next year, compared to 75% in 2007.
Thats a staggering increase. Most of the wealithest nations in the West now have to borrow money just to pay interest on the money theyve already borrowed.
This is why we can only expect more financial repression from desperate governments and established institutions.
This means more onerous taxation. More regulation. More controls over credit and capital flows.
And thats only the financial aspect; the deterioration of our freedom and liberty will continue at an accelerated pace.
Can a person still be considered free when 71% of what s/he earns is taken away at the point of a gun by a bankrupt, bullying government? Or are you merely a serf then, existing only to feed the system?
...
Hoe zou U het IMF en onze wereld het liefst verderhelpen? Een eenmalige heffing, een belasting op de spaartegoeden als een uitzonderlijke maatregel aka het Cyprus-stijl haarsnitje of zag U liever het nieuwste plan van de genieën van het IMF geimplementeerd, nl. de inkomsten van alle landen trachten te maximaliseren mbv. een verhoging van de inkomstenbelasting tot pakweg 71% (dit nieuwe plan noemt men bij het IMF: revenue-maximizing top income tax rates)?
Aan U de keuze, maar er moet nu ingegrepen worden zodat het kaartenhuisje, het globale financiële systeem niet instort.
Koop U vrij voor het te laat is!